# Extra Clang Tools 21.1.8 documentation

## clang-tidy - readability-function-cognitive-complexity

# readability-function-cognitive-complexity

Checks function Cognitive Complexity metric.

The metric is implemented as per the COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY by SonarSource specification version 1.2 (19 April 2017).

## Options

Threshold

  Flag functions with Cognitive Complexity exceeding this number. The default is 25.

DescribeBasicIncrements

  If set to true, then for each function exceeding the complexity threshold the check will issue additional diagnostics on every piece of code (loop, if statement, etc.) which contributes to that complexity. See also the examples below. Default is true.

IgnoreMacros

  If set to true, the check will ignore code inside macros. Note, that also any macro arguments are ignored, even if they should count to the complexity. As this might change in the future, this option isn’t guaranteed to be forward-compatible. Default is false.

## Building blocks

There are three basic building blocks of a Cognitive Complexity metric:

### Increment

The following structures increase the function’s Cognitive Complexity metric (by 1):

- Conditional operators:

  > - `if()`

  > - `else if()`

  > - `else`

  > - `cond ? true : false`

- `switch()`

- Loops:

  > - `for()`

  > - C++11 range-based `for()`

  > - `while()`

  > - `do while()`

- `catch ()`

- `goto LABEL`, `goto *(&&LABEL))`,

- sequences of binary logical operators:

  > - `boolean1 || boolean2`

  > - `boolean1 && boolean2`

### Nesting level

While by itself the nesting level does not change the function’s Cognitive Complexity metric, it is tracked, and is used by the next, third building block. The following structures increase the nesting level (by 1):

- Conditional operators:

  > - `if()`

  > - `else if()`

  > - `else`

  > - `cond ? true : false`

- `switch()`

- Loops:

  > - `for()`

  > - C++11 range-based `for()`

  > - `while()`

  > - `do while()`

- `catch ()`

- Nested functions:

  > - C++11 Lambda

  > - Nested `class`

  > - Nested `struct`

- GNU statement expression

- Apple Block Declaration

### Nesting increment

This is where the previous basic building block, Nesting level, matters. The following structures increase the function’s Cognitive Complexity metric by the current Nesting level:

- Conditional operators:

  > - `if()`

  > - `cond ? true : false`

- `switch()`

- Loops:

  > - `for()`

  > - C++11 range-based `for()`

  > - `while()`

  > - `do while()`

- `catch ()`

## Examples

The simplest case. This function has Cognitive Complexity of 0.

    void function0() {}

Slightly better example. This function has Cognitive Complexity of 1.

    int function1(bool var) {
      if(var) // +1, nesting level +1
        return 42;
      return 0;
    }

Full example. This function has Cognitive Complexity of 3.

    int function3(bool var1, bool var2) {
      if(var1) { // +1, nesting level +1
        if(var2)  // +2 (1 + current nesting level of 1), nesting level +1
          return 42;
      }

      return 0;
    }

In the last example, the check will flag function3 if the option Threshold is set to 2 or smaller. If the option DescribeBasicIncrements is set to true, it will additionally flag the two if statements with the amounts by which they increase to the complexity of the function and the current nesting level.

## Limitations

The metric is implemented with two notable exceptions:

  - preprocessor conditionals (`#ifdef`, `#if`, `#elif`, `#else`, `#endif`) are not accounted for.

  - each method in a recursion cycle is not accounted for. It can’t be fully implemented, because cross-translational-unit analysis would be needed, which is currently not possible in clang-tidy.